A randomized trial by researchers at an outpatient rehabilitation department in Italy involving 210 patients with chronic, nonspecific low back pain compared the effects of spinal manipulation, physiotherapy and back school. The participants were 210 patients (140 women and 70 men) with chronic, non-specific low back pain, average age 59. Back school and individual physiotherapy were scheduled as 15 1-hour-sessions for 3 weeks. Back school included group exercise and education/ergonomics. Individual physiotherapy included exercise, passive mobilization and soft-tissue treatment. Spinal manipulation included 4-6 20-minute sessions once-a-week.
Outcome measures were the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (scoring 0-24) and Pain Rating Scale (scoring 0-6), assessed at baseline, discharge, and at 3, 6, and 12months. 205 patients completed the study. At discharge, the results showed that spinal manipulation was associated with higher functional improvement and long-term pain relief than back school or individual physiotherapy, but received more further treatment at follow-ups; pain recurrences and drug intake were also reduced compared to back school or individual physiotherapy.
Reference: Cecchi F, Molino-Lova R, Chiti M, Pasquini G, Paperini A, Conti AA, Macchi C. Spinal manipulation compared with back school and with individually delivered physiotherapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized trial with one-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil 2010; 24: 26-36.
Dr. David P. Chen Chiropractor in Laurel, Maryland Laurel Regional Chiropractic www.laurelregionalchiropractic.com
Dr. David P. Chen received his Doctor of Chiropractic degree from the National University of Health and Sciences, where he graduated Magna Cum Laude. He also holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry from Purdue University. Dr. Chen believes in treating patients by using the latest and most effective chiropractic t...
Wellness.com does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment nor do we verify or endorse any specific business or professional
listed on the site. Wellness.com does not verify the accuracy or efficacy of user generated content, reviews, ratings, or any published
content on the site. Content, services, and products that appear on the Website are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any
disease, and any claims made therein have not been evaluated by the FDA. Use of this website constitutes acceptance of the
Terms of Use
and Privacy Policy.