http://green.wellness.com/blog/13275503/should-doctors-be-allowed-to-deny-care-to-unvaccinated-patients/fred-fletcher/comments/2
Good argument usually starts with the premise it is oppossing. In other words it starts withe the rationale of the opposing side. This paper does not do that. Rather it rails against a practice which it does not explain from the Doctor's view. Once this is explained one can argue against the foundation of the Physicians rationale. For example such physicians the author is criticizing may take an ethical position that they cannot collide with parental negligence of their child's health (refusing vaccines) not to speak of community health. Such a position is based on evidence. The author presents no evidence in his arguement but argues against the lack of findings. This is pretty unscientific so his position is easily rejected.
Posted by Sahli Cavallaro
http://green.wellness.com/blog/13275503/should-doctors-be-allowed-to-deny-care-to-unvaccinated-patients/fred-fletcher/comments/2
I don't know how this can be ethical when it comes to the Hippocratic Oath, but I do see a lot of schools not allowing children to enroll in school if they are not properly vaccinated.
Posted by jeremiah